Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2021May 31, 2021 AEST
The Definitional Debates on the Applicability of Jus In Bello’s Concept of ‘Damage’ and ‘Object’ in the Cyber Context: ‘Evolutive Interpretation’ as a Potential Solution
The Definitional Debates on the Applicability of Jus In Bello’s Concept of ‘Damage’ and ‘Object’ in the Cyber Context: ‘Evolutive Interpretation’ as a Potential Solution
Articles in Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2021
Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2021
- Introduction: Autumn 2021ANU JOLT
- Australian Information Businesses: The Adoption of an Information Fiduciary Framework in the Australian ContextSam Alexander
- Contracting by Artificial Intelligence: Open Offers, Unilateral Mistakes, and Why Algorithms Are Not AgentsMatthew Oliver
- The Smarts of ‘Smart Contracts’: Risk Management Capabilities and Applications of Self-Executing AgreementsByron Turner
- Augmenting Superintendent Discretion: Trustworthiness and the Automation of Construction ContractsBrydon WangMark Burdon
- Scroll, Click, Like, Share, Repeat: The Algorithmic Polarisation PhenomenonJye Beardow
- The Definitional Debates on the Applicability of Jus In Bello’s Concept of ‘Damage’ and ‘Object’ in the Cyber Context: ‘Evolutive Interpretation’ as a Potential SolutionMakoi Popioco
- Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: Challenges and OpportunitiesAllan GyngellStephanie Koorey
Makoi Popioco, The Definitional Debates on the Applicability of Jus In Bello’s Concept of ‘Damage’ and ‘Object’ in the Cyber Context: ‘Evolutive Interpretation’ as a Potential Solution, 2 ANU JOLT 165 (2021).